Monday, July 13, 2009
In recent decades many prominent scientists and politicans have announced the perceived threat of overpopulation and the urgent need, in their view, to take action to reverse global population growth. China, the most populous nation in the world, has maintained a one child per couple policy and has a governing system that effectively stifles dissent and aggressively enforces state policies.
Elsewhere, steps to shrink the global population have been primarily covert, and have included the spread of fertility and longevity reducing chemicals through food, drugs, air, and water, without the consent of the population. Many measures claimed to be provided for public health are not intended to foster individual health but are instead intended to facilitate a healthier society in the view of those who engineer civilization. From their perspective, the population must be reduced by a sizeable margin in a relatively short amount of time in order to support the well-being of those who remain. To avoid any public philosophical discussions of who should be euthanized or kept from breeding, those expediting these agendas merely plan how they can carry out measures to achieve their goals without the public ever realizing what is truly happening.
As an example, journalist Paul Joseph Watson in the UK has reviewed existing research and reported how
global sperm counts have dropped by a third since 1989 and by half in the past 50 years. The rate of decline is accelerating as more and more couples find it difficult to conceive children. The rate of decline is as much as 50 per cent in the last 30 years for white European men. Population suppression is clearly occurring in many areas of Europe and America. Hypothesized causes of this include cellphone radiation, soy products, and female hormones from hormone replacement products seeping into the water supply. Environmental pollution from industry and pharmaceutical products has certainly contributed, yet new research has uncovered that additional chemicals known as Antiandrogens are now finding their way into the water supply.
"The University of Exeter is now working with chemists at the University of Sussex to establish exactly what the chemicals in question are, and hence to understand how they are being released into waste water." John Holdren, U.S. President Obama's leading science czar, openly proposed medicating the municipal water supplies with sterility inducing chemicals in his 1977 book Ecoscience. He believed that adding a sterility inducing agent to drinking water and staple foods would be an effective way to reduce population.
Antiandrogens are capable of preventing or inhibiting the biological activities of androgens, male sex hormones. Antiandrogens used in pesticides sprayed on our food have been recognized as
"endocrine disruptors." These compounds have been found to "induce demasculinization in rats," making male rats unable to impregnate females. These newly discovered poisons, combined with contraceptive pills and other hormone-based drugs have literally had the effect of gender-bending no less than a third of male fish in all British rivers, which causes them to produce eggs and make them infertile. Dozens of species besides fish, such as polar bears, bald eagles, otters and whales are being affected by these chemicals. In waterways that are located close to sewage treatment facilities, about 80 per cent of male fish were found to have female characteristics.
One of the most promising means of inducing population reduction is the creation of apparent infectious disease epidemics. Once declared, an epidemic would give authorities power to forcibly treat those who are ill and forcibly vaccinate those who haven't come down with the cited illness. The medications used to treat viral illnesses are often more dangerous than the virus since they can impair natural immune response. Vaccinations are also a hazard to the immune system and can induce a number of illnesses that can greatly reduce the reproductive potential of citizens. Autism is one common condition associated with vaccine-induced illness, and since autistic people generally have great social and communication deficits they are less likely to form bonds and produce offspring than persons unaffected by autism. The amount of vaccine-induced deaths and illnesses is greatly underreported, yet even the acknowledged harm caused by vaccines raises great concern for many people who feel bullied into getting shots or having their children subjected to a barrage of immunizations.
In part two of this report I will share a set of information collected by the Natural Solutions Foundation, which when assembled paints a clear picture of what seems to be transpiring. We can use this information to protect our health and offer help for our loved ones.
Jed Shlackman, LMHC, C.Ht. is a holistic therapist in Miami FL. http://www.phinsights.com